Just what about “bowling for columbine” is being discovered as fraud? Clearly he has an ‘agenda’, but to act like this is the first documentary with any sort of agenda seems a little odd. The article that was posted focuses on some minor technical requirements that may or may not be true (the source, worldnetdaily, is as big a propaganda-mouthpiece as Moore is, if not more), but even if the accusations are correct, does the fact that he didn’t run advertisements for the required number of days really change how you view the movie? Or is there something else I’m missing?
jonner
Sep 04 2003
09:42 am
Just what about “bowling for columbine” is being discovered as fraud? Clearly he has an ‘agenda’, but to act like this is the first documentary with any sort of agenda seems a little odd. The article that was posted focuses on some minor technical requirements that may or may not be true (the source, worldnetdaily, is as big a propaganda-mouthpiece as Moore is, if not more), but even if the accusations are correct, does the fact that he didn’t run advertisements for the required number of days really change how you view the movie? Or is there something else I’m missing?